1
Pro tip: a 737's old hydraulic line taught me to trust the manual, not the shortcut
We had a plane at our Denver hangar with a slow leak on a line that had been 'fixed' with a quick-seal patch about 18 months ago. The patch finally failed completely last Tuesday, and the full replacement the manual called for took three hours. It made me realize how many times we skip the full procedure to save an hour, only to lose a whole day later. Anyone else have a story where the book procedure actually saved you more time in the end?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
palmer.laura2mo ago
Oh man, that's so true. We had a similar thing with a worn bushing on a cargo door track. The 'temporary' fix with a shim lasted a few weeks before it jammed. Following the manual for the full bushing replacement took half a day, but we wasted two full days before that messing with the quick fix.
9
thompson.tyler1d ago
Doesn't it feel like the "temporary" is always the longest road? I was reading an article in an old trade magazine about this exact thing. They had a piece on how the Navy does their aircraft maintenance and they basically force you to live by the manual because of these exact stories. @emery18 is spot on, the math just doesn't work out in your favor when you try to cut corners. It's like you pay for it twice in time and then once more in hassle when it fails.
10
emery182mo ago
Yeah @palmer.laura, that's the whole lesson right there. The quick fix always seems faster until it isn't. You end up doing the real job twice, once the wrong way and once the right way. It just eats up more time and money. I've learned the hard way to just do the full repair from the start.
3