3
Still don't get the hype about those ceremonial bronze mirrors from the Han dynasty
Talked to a curator at the museum last week who said they're mostly about status, not actual practical use - the reflection quality is terrible compared to later stuff. Am I missing something about why everyone treats them like the peak of ancient craftsmanship?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
the_spencer13d ago
Honestly I read somewhere that those mirrors weren't really meant for looking at yourself anyway. Supposedly they were used in rituals to reflect light or catch sunbeams or something like that. The craftsmanship thing is more about the intricate patterns on the back and how they managed to cast such detailed bronze work without modern tools. Tbh the fact that they survived 2000 years still shiny is kind of impressive even if the reflection sucks.
5
garcia.charles13d ago
That 2000 year old detail the_spencer mentioned really stuck with me. I used to just think they were old junk mirrors, but then I saw one up close at a friend's house who collects antiques. The back of it had these tiny dragons and cloud patterns carved so deep and precise, you could feel every line with your fingertip. It made me realize the real art was in the decoration and the metal work, not the reflection. Changed my whole view on why folks call them masterpieces.
4