PSA: Recipe blogs beat YouTube tutorials for weeknight meals, and here's my proof

I spent last week doing a head-to-head test with my go-to chicken stir fry. The YouTube video took 18 minutes to watch with all the intros and promos, then I had to keep pausing to check the pan. The recipe blog post had the same technique but laid out in bullet points, and I finished cooking in 31 minutes total. The video version left me with soggy veggies because the steps were buried in chatter, while the blog's exact heat settings saved the crunch. Anyone else found that short written steps beat long videos when you're actually cooking, or is it just me being impatient?

1 comments

1 Comment

the_kevin17d ago

That 18 minute video time sounds about right, and it's why I basically stopped using them for anything but pastry work. The one thing I'll add is that blogs win on search too, since I can Ctrl+F a specific ingredient or step without scrubbing through a timeline. My last attempt at a beef and broccoli recipe had me replaying the same 10 second clip five times just to see how dark the sauce was supposed to get. Written notes with a photo of the finished thing beats that every time.