I was wrong about using a static site generator for my portfolio
For the past year, I kept my graphic design portfolio as a single, huge PDF file. I thought it was easier for clients to download and view. Then, a potential client in Austin told me it took over a minute to load on their phone and they gave up. That convinced me I had to choose between a fancy, complex website builder or a simple static site generator. I picked the static generator, Jekyll, even though I was scared of the code. It took me a solid weekend to set up, following a guide I found on an old web design forum. Now the site loads instantly, and I can update it from my text editor. Has anyone else made a similar switch for a client-facing site and found it worth the hassle?